Page Last Updated: November 21, 2025

USDTL Urine Toxicology (Maternal)🔗

Table Name:
bio_bm_biosample_urine
Construct:
Drug Panel, Toxins

Data Warning

Continuous Variables
For all toxicology screens, continuous variables should be interpreted with caution based on the threshold limits of quantification (LOQs), or the cutoff concentration used to categorize metabolites as positive or negative. LOQs are provided in Table 1. Urine Assay Thresholds for Analytes.

Urinary Concentration Corrections
Urine concentrations vary by participant. Urinary concentration corrections can be made using creatinine results from sample validation or specific gravity. Creatinine values are provided for researchers who wish to adjust/correct for urinary concentration in continuous measures or apply different thresholds.

Large Gaps Between Collection and Analysis Dates
A substantial number of samples show unusually long intervals between collection and analysis (e.g., over 100–300 days, compared to the 30-day limit specified by internal SOPs). We are working to determine whether this reflects a data entry or site-level issue and will provide an update once more information is available.

This data has known issues - see details.

Administration & Quality Control🔗

Respondent Pregnant/postpartum person
Administration Self-collected
Visits V01
Completion Time 5 min
Quality Control Examine assay ranges and categorical versus continuous measures.

Instrument Details🔗

These data are the results of urine toxicology assays. Screening results for substances are determined to be positive or negative based on predefined thresholds (Table 1), or invalid - see Validation Procedures. Confirmatory tests are used to confirm the results of screening for any substance analyte (e.g. Amphetamine (c_amp_u)), which are grouped into different classes by analyte screening tests and analyte confirmatory tests (Table 2).

Table 1. Urine Assay Thresholds for Analytes
Analyte LODLimit of detection (ng/mL) LOQLimit of quantification (ng/mL) Cutoff (ng/mL) Detection Window
Amphetamine 50 100 250 2-3 days
Methamphetamine 50 100 250 2-3 days
MDA 50 100 250 2-3 days
MDMA 50 100 250 2-3 days
MDEA 50 100 250 2-3 days
Carboxy-delta-9-THC 3 7.5 15 2-5 days for casual use; 10-14 for chronic use
Carboxy-delta-8-THC 3 7.5 15 No consensus
Carboxy-cannabidiol 10 25 50 No consensus
Cotinine Based on DRI® Cotinine assay for the qualitative and semiquantitative determination of Cotinine 34 34 500 Up to 7 days
Benzoylecgonine 20 50 100 2-3 days
6-MAM 2 4 10 8 hours
Codeine 10 50 100 2-3 days
Hydrocodone 10 50 100 2-3 days
Hydromorphone 10 50 100 2-3 days
Morphine 10 50 100 2-3 days
Oxycodone 60 120 300 2-3 days
Oxymorphone 60 120 300 2-3 days
Phencyclidine 5 12.5 25 2-3 days
Methadone 60 120 300 2-3 days
EDDP 60 120 300 2-3 days
Amobarbital 40 100 200 2-4 days
Butalbital 40 100 200 2-4 days
Pentobarbital 40 100 200 1-2 days
Phenobarbital 40 100 200 2 weeks
Secobarbital 40 100 200 1-2 days
α-Hydroxyalprazolam 20 40 100 1-4 days
α -Hydroxytirazolam 20 40 100 1-4 days
α -Hydroxymidazolam 20 40 100 1-4 days
2-Hydroxyethylflurazepam 20 40 100 1-4 days
7-Aminoflunitrazepam 20 40 100 1-4 days
7-Aminoclonazepam 20 40 100 1-4 days
7-Aminonitrazepam 20 40 100 1-4 days
Lorazepam 20 40 100 1-4 days
Nordiazepam 20 40 100 1-4 days
Oxazepam 20 40 100 1-4 days
Temazepam 20 40 100 1-4 days
Norpropoxyphene 10 50 100 2-3 days
Ketamine 10 50 100 2-3 days
Norketamine 10 50 100 2-3 days
Normeperidine 40 100 200 2-3 days
Tramadol 40 80 200 2-3 days
Buprenorphine 1 2 5 2-3 days
Norbuprenorphine 1 2 5 2-3 days
Ethyl glucuronide 50 100 100 2-3 days
Ethyl sulfate 12.5 25 25 2-3 days
Zolpidem 4 8 20 2-3 days
Zolpidem Carboxylic Acid 4 8 20 2-3 days
Carisoprodol 10 20 50 2-3 days
Meprobamate 10 20 50 2-3 days
Analyte LOD (pg/mL) LOQ (pg/mL) Cutoff (pg/mL) Detection Window
Fentanyl 40 40 100 2-3 days
Norfentanyl 40 40 100 2-3 days
Alfentanil 40 40 100 2-3 days
Sufentanil 40 40 100 2-3 days
Norsufentanil 40 40 100 2-3 days
Table 2. Mapping From Class to Screening Tests and Confirmatory Tests
Class Screening Test Confirmatory Test (positive screen reflex)
stimulant (c_any_stim_u)
amp (s_amp_u)
Amphetamine (c_amp_u)
Methamphetamine (c_meth_u)
mdma (s_mdma_u)
MDM (c_mdm_u)
MDA (c_mda_u)
MDEA (c_mdea_u)
coc (s_coc_u) Benzoylecgonine (c_ben_u)
cannabinoid (c_any_cannabinoid_u)
thc (s_thc_u)
Carboxy-delta-9-THC (c_delta-9-THC_u)
Carboxy-Cannabidiol (c_cannabidiol_u)
Carboxy-delta-8-THC (c_delta-8-THC_u)
barbiturate (c_any_barb_u)
bar (s_bar_u)
Amobarbital (c_amobarb_u)
Secobarbital (c_secobarb_u)
Pentobarbital (c_pentobarb_u)
Phenobarbital (c_phenobarb_u)
Butalbital (c_butalbital_u)
benzodiazepine (c_any_benzo_u)
benz (s_benz_u)
Oxazepam (c_oxaz_u)
Nordiazepam (c_nord_u)
Temazepam (c_tema_u)
Hydroxymidazolam (c_homi_u)
Alphahydroxyalprazolam (c_aha_u)
2hydroxyethylflurazepam (c_2hef_u)
7Aminoclonazepam (c_7ac_u)
7Aminoflunitrazepam (c_7af_u)
7Aminonitrazepam (c_7an_u)
Alphahydroxytriazolam (c_aht_u)
Lorazepam (c_lor_u)
opioids (c_any_opioid_u)
opi (s_opi_u)
Codeine (c_cod_u)
Morphine (c_mor_u)
MAM (c_mam_u)
Hydrocodone (c_hydroc_u)
Hydromorphone (c_hydrom_u)
mtd (s_mtd_u)
Methadone (c_mtd_u)
EDDP (c_eddp_u)
ppx (s_ppx_u) Norpropoxyphene (c_nppx_u)
oxyc (s_oxyc_u)
Oxycodone (c_oxyc_u)
Oxymorphone (c_oxym_u)
mep (s_mep_u) Normeperidine (c_nmep_u)
tram (s_tram_u) Tramadol (c_tram_u)
fent (s_fent_u)
Fentanyl (c_fent_u)
Norfentanyl (c_nfent_u)
Alfentanil (c_afent_u)
suf (s_suf_u)
Norsufentanil (c_nsuf_u)
Sufentanil (c_suf_u)
bup (s_bup_u)
Buprenorphine (c_bup_u)
Norbuprenorpine (c_nbup_u)
muscle relaxant (c_any_mscrlx_u)
crs (s_crs_u)
Carisoprodol (c_crs_u)
Meprobamate (c_mepb_u)
ethanol (c_ethanol_u)
etgeia (s_etgeia_u)
EthylGluc-0100 (c_ethglu_u)
EthylSul-100 (c_ethsyl_u)
sedative (c_sedative_u)
zol (s_zol_u)
Zolpidem (c_zol_u)
Zolpidem CA (c_zolc_u)
dissociative anesthetic (c_disanesth_u)
ket (s_ket_u)
Ketamine (c_ket_u)
Norketamine (c_nket_u)
pcp (s_pcp_u) Phencyclidine (c_pcp_u)
nicotine (c_nicotine_u)   Cotinine (c_cot_u)
Validation Procedures

Assay results may be scored as invalid if specimens are identified as dilute, substituted, adulterated, or otherwise insufficient based on validation. Validation is based on creatinine, pH, and nitrite measurements. Only specimens with low creatinine (< 20 mg/dL) are confirmed using specific gravity via a refractometer (decision grid below), and the creatinine analysis is repeated to rule out issues with the first analysis (e.g. sample mix-ups, air bubble in a line on the instrument, etc.).


Scoring Procedures

Final results for each substance follows these rules:

  • If the confirmatory test for any substance analyte (e.g. Amphetamine (c_amp_u)) is positive based on predefined thresholds (Table 1), the class-level (c_any_stim_u) and sample-level (c_any_specimen_u) are also positive (value =1).
  • Otherwise, if the substance analyte confirmatory tests are negative (e.g., c_ethglu_u and c_ethsyl_u, values = 0) then class-level (e.g., c_etgeia_u) are negative (value =0). If all classes are negative (value = 0), then sample-level (e.g., c_any_specimen_u) are negative (value = 0).
  • Finally, if any substance analyte confirmatory tests are invalid (value = 3) then that class-level, and sample-level values are also invalid (value = 3).

Table 3. Screening Result Scoring

Level Result Type Example Options
Specimen Confirmatory results (presence of any analyte) c_any_specimen_u 1=positive; 0=negative; 3=invalid
Class Confirmatory results (presence of any analyte in class) c_any_stim_u 1=positive; 0=negative; 3=invalid
Analyte Screening results s_amp_u 1=positive; 0=negative; 3=invalid
Confirmatory results c_amp_u concentration value
Confirmatory results - categorical c_amp_u_cat** 1=positive; 0=negative; 3=invalid; 4=screen negative
**Note: the categorical confirmatory test variable for nicotine follows the convention: c_nicotine_u.

References🔗

Sullivan, E. L., Bogdan, R., Bakhireva, L., Levitt, P., Jones, J., Sheldon, M., Croff, J. M., Thomason, M., Lo, J. O., MacIntyre, L., Shrivastava, S., Cioffredi, L.-A., Edlow, A. G., Howell, B. R., Chaiyachati, B. H., Lashley-Simms, N., Molloy, K., Lam, C., Stoermann, A. M., … HBCD Biospecimens Workgroup. (2024). Biospecimens in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) study: Rationale and protocol. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 70(101451), 101451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101451